Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Released January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and WB2200F (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z35 was announced 4 years earlier than the WB2200F and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-Z35 grades versus the WB2200F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Samsung WB2200F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung WB2200F
| EX-Z35 | WB2200F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Casio EX-Z35
| WB2200F | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | February 2010 | More recent by 47 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB2200F
| EX-Z35 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 has got external dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB2200F has dimensions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the WB2200F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and WB2200F is 96 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements purely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and WB2200F.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Samsung WB2200F to give extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung WB2200F |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-02-21 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dot |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 1/8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 pounds) | 708 grams (1.56 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-82 | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $99 | $599 |