Clicky

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front
 
Samsung WB2200F front
Portability
59
Imaging
40
Features
48
Overall
43

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs

Casio EX-Z35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
  • Introduced February 2010
Samsung WB2200F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
  • Released January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview

On this page, we will be comparing the Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and WB2200F (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-Z35 was announced 4 years earlier than the WB2200F and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-Z35 grades versus the WB2200F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung WB2200F

 EX-Z35 WB2200F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Casio EX-Z35

 WB2200F EX-Z35 
ReleasedJanuary 2014February 2010More recent by 47 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB2200F

 EX-Z35 WB2200F 
Manual focus More exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison

If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 has got external dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB2200F has dimensions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).

Compare the Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the WB2200F.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and WB2200F is 96 and 59 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements purely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and WB2200F.

Clearly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Samsung WB2200F to give extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB2200F Portrait photography factors
27
has manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
44
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
supports face detect focus
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Street photography info
Samsung WB2200F Street photography info
48
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
40
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
heavier than competition (708g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Sports photography advice
Samsung WB2200F Sports photography advice
17
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
53
excellent zoom range (20-1200mm 60.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
supports tracking focus
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB2200F as a Travel photography camera
52
flash built-in
no Timelapse function
low resolution (12 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
51
good MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (20mm)
great reach (1200mm)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (708 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-Z35
Landscape photography with Samsung WB2200F
28
has manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.5")
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Timelapse function
46
has manual focus
fairly wide (20mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-Z35
Vlogging with Samsung WB2200F
22
wide angle not good (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not have a selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
no external microphone support
25
fairly wide (20mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
no mic port
heavier than competition (708 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB2200F
 Casio Exilim EX-Z35Samsung WB2200F
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z35 Samsung WB2200F
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2010-02-21 2014-01-07
Body design Ultracompact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-107mm (3.0x) 20-1200mm (60.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range 10cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 200k dot
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 1/8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed - 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.20 m 6.00 m (ISO Auto)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 124 grams (0.27 pounds) 708 grams (1.56 pounds)
Physical dimensions 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-82 BP-1410
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD, SDHC, SCXC
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $99 $599