Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32c25/32c25c6ef6b46a16d6fe37b7519c064ff3aff376" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 front Olympus OM-D E-M10 front"
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Released February 2008
- Older Model is Olympus E-1
- Replacement is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Announced March 2014
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are manufactured by Olympus. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and E-M10 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-3 was launched 7 years before the E-M10 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-3 grades vs the E-M10 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-3 & Olympus OM-D E-M10. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus E-M10
E-3 | E-M10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Olympus E-3
E-M10 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2014 | ![]() | February 2008 | Newer by 73 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus E-M10
E-3 | E-M10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-3 has external dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 has dimensions of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-3 versus the E-M10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52203/52203529af29c4f5982c3574e58228f4983dee57" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and E-M10 is 56 and 82 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6016/e60167f41f8777082fb39397c417947e69c05246" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by researching technical specs. The picture underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and E-M10.
As you can tell, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Olympus E-M10 to render greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a8c4/6a8c4f034520f41bb5966e31b04fe7bfbd2d4426" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70cdf/70cdf8a2b897a412d833574c75996642c19b2a42" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-3 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2008-02-20 | 2014-03-18 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.58x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 5.80 m (ISO100) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 890 gr (1.96 pounds) | 396 gr (0.87 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | 72 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 571 | 884 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $670 | $600 |