Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB700
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
98 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Announced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed December 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB700, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is relatively close and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z35 was unveiled 10 months prior to the WB700 so they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB700 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-Z35 matches up against the WB700 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Samsung WB700. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung WB700
| EX-Z35 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Casio EX-Z35
| WB700 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2010 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 10 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB700
| EX-Z35 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z35 features outer dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB700 has measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB700 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z35 vs the WB700.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and WB700 is 96 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to see the gap in sensor sizes just by viewing technical specs. The image here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and WB700.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Samsung WB700 to render extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung WB700 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-02-21 | 2010-12-28 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | () |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lb) | - |
| Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $99 | $300 |