Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A7S
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
77 Imaging
60 Features
73 Overall
65
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A7S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 409600
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 489g - 127 x 94 x 48mm
- Introduced April 2014
- Renewed by Sony A7S II
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A7S Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Casio EX-Z35 and Sony A7S, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Sony. The image resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the A7S (12MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and A7S (Full frame) provide totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z35 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the A7S which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A7S being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-Z35 matches up versus the A7S for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A7S Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Sony Alpha A7S. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Sony A7S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Sony A7S
| EX-Z35 | A7S |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A7S over the Casio EX-Z35
| A7S | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2014 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 50 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Sony A7S
| EX-Z35 | A7S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A7S Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z35 has got external measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Sony A7S has specifications of 127mm x 94mm x 48mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 1.9") with a weight of 489 grams (1.08 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z35 and Sony A7S in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z35 vs the A7S.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and A7S is 96 and 77 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A7S Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by looking at specs. The picture underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z35 and A7S.
All in all, both cameras have the same megapixels but not the same sensor sizes. The EX-Z35 offers the tinier sensor which should make achieving shallower DOF trickier. The more aged EX-Z35 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A7S Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A7S Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sony Alpha A7S | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sony Alpha A7S |
| Class | Ultracompact | Pro Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2010-02-21 | 2014-04-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 855.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4240 x 2832 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 409600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.71x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 3840 x 2160, XAVC S 1080 60p(50Mbps), 30p (50Mbps), 24p (50Mbps). 720 120p (50Mbps). AVCHD 60p (28Mbps), 60i (24Mbps/17Mbps), 24p (24Mbps/17Mbps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124g (0.27 lbs) | 489g (1.08 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 127 x 94 x 48mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 87 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.2 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 3702 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 360 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-82 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
| Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $99 | $1,998 |