Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh PX
95 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2011
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh PX Overview
Lets look closer at the Casio EX-Z400 versus Ricoh PX, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and PX (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-Z400 was introduced 3 years prior to the PX which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-Z400 scores vs the PX when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh PX Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 & Ricoh PX. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery & Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh PX
| EX-Z400 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Casio EX-Z400
| PX | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2011 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 31 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh PX
| EX-Z400 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z400 has physical dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Ricoh PX has specifications of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z400 versus Ricoh PX in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z400 versus the PX.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and PX is 95 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions just by going through specifications. The pic here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z400 and PX.
Plainly, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh PX to show greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z400 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh PX Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh PX | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh PX |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2011-08-16 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3072 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/3.9-5.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 130 gr (0.29 pounds) | 156 gr (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $0 | $329 |
