Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-20
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-20, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and the WG-20 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z400 was released 6 years prior to the WG-20 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the EX-Z400 scores versus the WG-20 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 and Ricoh WG-20. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery and Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh WG-20
| EX-Z400 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Casio EX-Z400
| WG-20 | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 61 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh WG-20
| EX-Z400 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z400 features exterior measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-20 has measurements of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-20 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the EX-Z400 versus the WG-20.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and WG-20 is 95 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements simply by checking out technical specs. The visual below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z400 and WG-20.
As you have seen, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-20 to show more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older EX-Z400 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh WG-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh WG-20 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 130 gr (0.29 lb) | 164 gr (0.36 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-40 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $370 |