Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
95 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z400 was introduced 6 years prior to the WG-4 GPS and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-Z400 grades versus the WG-4 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-Z400 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-Z400
WG-4 GPS | EX-Z400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | January 2009 | More recent by 61 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-Z400 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z400 enjoys physical dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z400 vs the WG-4 GPS.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z400 and WG-4 GPS is 95 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by seeing specs. The visual underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z400 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to provide more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The older EX-Z400 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 130g (0.29 lbs) | 235g (0.52 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-40 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $0 | $210 |