Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB210
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced July 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-Z400 and Samsung WB210, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z400 was brought out 3 years prior to the WB210 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-Z400 matches up vs the WB210 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 and Samsung WB210. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Samsung WB210
| EX-Z400 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 1k | Sharper display (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Casio EX-Z400
| WB210 | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 30 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Samsung WB210
| EX-Z400 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z400 has outer measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z400 and Samsung WB210 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the EX-Z400 against the WB210.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z400 and WB210 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing purely by going through technical specs. The visual below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z400 and WB210.
As you can tell, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung WB210 to produce more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The older EX-Z400 will be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Samsung WB210 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 130g (0.29 lb) | 174g (0.38 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $0 | $279 |