Casio EX-Z400 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
70 Imaging
62 Features
38 Overall
52
Casio EX-Z400 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Revealed February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z400 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-Z400 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Sigma. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the EX-Z400 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z400 was launched 6 years before the DP2 Quattro which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-Z400 scores versus the DP2 Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z400 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| EX-Z400 | DP2 Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-Z400
| DP2 Quattro | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | January 2009 | Newer by 62 months | |
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
| EX-Z400 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z400 features physical dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z400 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z400 against the DP2 Quattro.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and DP2 Quattro is 95 and 70 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions simply by looking through technical specs. The pic below may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z400 and DP2 Quattro.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z400 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z400 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z400 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
| Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TRUE III engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/2.8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/2s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 130g (0.29 lbs) | 395g (0.87 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $0 | $931 |