Casio EX-Z450 vs Fujifilm S8300
96 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z450 vs Fujifilm S8300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-5.8) lens
- 128g - 81 x 56 x 21mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/7000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1008mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z450 vs Fujifilm S8300 Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the Casio EX-Z450 and Fujifilm S8300, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and FujiFilm. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the EX-Z450 (12MP) and Fujifilm S8300 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z450 was released 4 years earlier than the Fujifilm S8300 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z450 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S8300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-Z450 scores versus the Fujifilm S8300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z450 vs Fujifilm S8300 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z450 and Fujifilm FinePix S8300. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z450 Gallery and Fujifilm S8300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z450 over the Fujifilm S8300
| EX-Z450 | Fujifilm S8300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8300 over the Casio EX-Z450
| Fujifilm S8300 | EX-Z450 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 | August 2009 | Fresher by 41 months | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z450 and Fujifilm S8300
| EX-Z450 | Fujifilm S8300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z450 vs Fujifilm S8300 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z450 comes with external dimensions of 81mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.2" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm S8300 has proportions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z450 and Fujifilm S8300 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the EX-Z450 vs the Fujifilm S8300.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z450 and Fujifilm S8300 is 96 and 61 respectively.
Casio EX-Z450 vs Fujifilm S8300 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing merely by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z450 and Fujifilm S8300.
As you can see, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Fujifilm S8300 to produce extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The older EX-Z450 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z450 vs Fujifilm S8300 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z450 vs Fujifilm S8300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z450 | Fujifilm FinePix S8300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z450 | Fujifilm FinePix S8300 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-08-18 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-1008mm (42.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-5.8 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 0cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dot |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/7000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 128g (0.28 lbs) | 670g (1.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 81 x 56 x 21mm (3.2" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $229 | $200 |