Casio EX-Z450 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
96 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30


91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z450 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-5.8) lens
- 128g - 81 x 56 x 21mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014

Casio EX-Z450 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Casio EX-Z450 and Olympus TG-850 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the EX-Z450 (12MP) and TG-850 iHS (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

The EX-Z450 was introduced 5 years before the TG-850 iHS and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-Z450 matches up against the TG-850 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-Z450 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z450 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z450 Gallery & Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z450 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
EX-Z450 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Casio EX-Z450
TG-850 iHS | EX-Z450 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | August 2009 | Fresher by 54 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z450 and Olympus TG-850 iHS
EX-Z450 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z450 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z450 enjoys external dimensions of 81mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.2" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Olympus TG-850 iHS has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z450 and Olympus TG-850 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z450 against the TG-850 iHS.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z450 and TG-850 iHS is 96 and 91 respectively.

Casio EX-Z450 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing simply by viewing technical specs. The graphic below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z450 and TG-850 iHS.
As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can expect the Olympus TG-850 iHS to provide you with more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The older EX-Z450 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z450 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z450 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z450 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z450 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-08-18 | 2014-01-29 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4616 x 3464 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.6-5.8 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 1/2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 128 grams (0.28 pounds) | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) |
Dimensions | 81 x 56 x 21mm (3.2" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-40 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $229 | $250 |