Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB2200F
96 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b31e/3b31ec5d5796305b3877b7df282e1e8aead106cd" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z450 front Casio Exilim EX-Z450 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba44a/ba44a222150612400a1bd4c12a80aaa4b3435771" alt="Samsung WB2200F front Samsung WB2200F front"
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-5.8) lens
- 128g - 81 x 56 x 21mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Introduced January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Following is a comprehensive review of the Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB2200F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the EX-Z450 (12MP) and WB2200F (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The EX-Z450 was manufactured 5 years prior to the WB2200F which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z450 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-Z450 grades versus the WB2200F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z450 and Samsung WB2200F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z450 Gallery and Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z450 over the Samsung WB2200F
EX-Z450 | WB2200F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Casio EX-Z450
WB2200F | EX-Z450 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | August 2009 | More modern by 53 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z450 and Samsung WB2200F
EX-Z450 | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z450 offers external dimensions of 81mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.2" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has specifications of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB2200F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z450 against the WB2200F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e1d0/2e1d0f03b5de94fae6261b7ee2b69e6ba759048b" alt="Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z450 and WB2200F is 96 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17ef7/17ef7fa0b0d0419b9c27fbe4879dac731fdf37f2" alt="Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes just by looking at a spec sheet. The image underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z450 and WB2200F.
As you can see, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Samsung WB2200F to give more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z450 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8505e/8505e3fbf18be689ade5de1ca0fabe96ca11cee9" alt="Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61037/610377d73edaa1a2e0f744e087b7545502a76c84" alt="Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-Z450 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z450 | Samsung WB2200F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z450 | Samsung WB2200F |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-08-18 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.6-5.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 1/8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 128 gr (0.28 pounds) | 708 gr (1.56 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 81 x 56 x 21mm (3.2" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-40 | BP-1410 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $229 | $599 |