Casio EX-Z800 vs Kodak M575
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
95 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
Casio EX-Z800 vs Kodak M575 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z800 vs Kodak M575 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-Z800 and Kodak M575, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Casio and Kodak. The resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the M575 (14MP) is pretty similar and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z800 was announced 7 months after the M575 so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-Z800 scores versus the M575 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z800 vs Kodak M575 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & Kodak EasyShare M575. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & Kodak M575 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Kodak M575
| EX-Z800 | M575 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 7 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Casio EX-Z800
| M575 | EX-Z800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Kodak M575
| EX-Z800 | M575 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Kodak M575 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z800 enjoys exterior measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Kodak M575 has dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z800 and Kodak M575 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z800 versus the M575.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z800 and M575 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Kodak M575 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading a spec sheet. The picture here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z800 and M575.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP so you can expect similar quality of pictures but you would want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The younger EX-Z800 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Kodak M575 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z800 vs Kodak M575 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Kodak EasyShare M575 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Kodak EasyShare M575 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2010-01-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $150 | $139 |