Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh CX4
Portability
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Portability
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
Olympus VH-515
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched August 2012
Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh CX4, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the VH-515 (12MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is very close and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VH-515 was manufactured 2 years after the CX4 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the VH-515 matches up vs the CX4 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VH-515 & Ricoh CX4. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VH-515 Gallery & Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Ricoh CX4
| VH-515 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2012 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 25 months |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus VH-515
| CX4 | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VH-515 and Ricoh CX4
| VH-515 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus VH-515 offers exterior measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Ricoh CX4 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh CX4 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the VH-515 vs the CX4.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the VH-515 and CX4 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes purely by researching specs. The picture here should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the VH-515 and CX4.
As you can plainly see, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus VH-515 to result in extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The fresher VH-515 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus VH-515
Portrait photography with Ricoh CX4
provides face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
has manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Olympus VH-515 Street photography information
Ricoh CX4 Street photography information
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers focus via touch
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205g)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Olympus VH-515 Sports photography features
Ricoh CX4 Sports photography features
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking focus
max frames per second low (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
max frames per second low (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
low megapixels (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Olympus VH-515 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Travel photography camera
offers focus via touch
built-in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
very long reach (300mm)
low megapixels (10MP)
does not have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Olympus VH-515 Landscape photography features
Ricoh CX4 Landscape photography features
reasonably wide (26mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not possible
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
does not have Timelapse recording
has manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
low megapixels (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Olympus VH-515 Vlogging advice
Ricoh CX4 Vlogging advice
reasonably wide (26mm)
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
does not have microphone support
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not have a selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Olympus VH-515 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus VH-515 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-08-21 | 2010-08-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lb) | 205 grams (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-50B | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $648 | $211 |