Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung TL350
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Also referred to as WB2000
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Casio EX-Z800 versus Samsung TL350, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and TL350 (10MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z800 was manufactured 6 months after the TL350 so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung TL350 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-Z800 scores against the TL350 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & Samsung TL350. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Samsung TL350
EX-Z800 | TL350 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Casio EX-Z800
TL350 | EX-Z800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Samsung TL350
EX-Z800 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2010 | February 2010 | Same age | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z800 provides exterior dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung TL350 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z800 versus Samsung TL350 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z800 versus the TL350.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z800 and TL350 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by researching specs. The pic below may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z800 and TL350.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Casio EX-Z800 to provide you with more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung TL350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung TL350 |
Other name | - | WB2000 |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-08-03 | 2010-02-20 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.4-5.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) | 195 gr (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-120 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $150 | $400 |