Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB350F
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
90 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-Z800 and Samsung WB350F, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z800 was announced 4 years before the WB350F and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-Z800 scores against the WB350F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & Samsung WB350F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Samsung WB350F
| EX-Z800 | WB350F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Casio EX-Z800
| WB350F | EX-Z800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 41 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Samsung WB350F
| EX-Z800 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z800 enjoys exterior dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has specifications of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z800 and Samsung WB350F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z800 and the WB350F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z800 and WB350F is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements just by going over a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z800 and WB350F.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB350F to deliver extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z800 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung WB350F |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124g (0.27 pounds) | 276g (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $150 | $260 |