Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB350F
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-Z800 and Samsung WB350F, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z800 was announced 4 years before the WB350F and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-Z800 scores against the WB350F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & Samsung WB350F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Samsung WB350F
| EX-Z800 | WB350F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Casio EX-Z800
| WB350F | EX-Z800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 41 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Samsung WB350F
| EX-Z800 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z800 enjoys exterior dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has specifications of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z800 and Samsung WB350F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z800 and the WB350F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z800 and WB350F is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements just by going over a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z800 and WB350F.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB350F to deliver extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z800 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung WB350F |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124g (0.27 pounds) | 276g (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $150 | $260 |