Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-320
96 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
94 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 121g - 90 x 52 x 19mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Casio EX-Z90 versus Olympus VR-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-Z90 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z90 was manufactured 23 months before the VR-320 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short overview of how the EX-Z90 grades versus the VR-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z90 & Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z90 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z90 over the Olympus VR-320
| EX-Z90 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Casio EX-Z90
| VR-320 | EX-Z90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2011 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 23 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z90 and Olympus VR-320
| EX-Z90 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z90 provides physical measurements of 90mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z90 versus Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z90 versus the VR-320.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z90 and VR-320 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specifications. The image below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z90 and VR-320.
Plainly, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus VR-320 to show more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z90 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-08-18 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 4 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121 gr (0.27 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 52 x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-60 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $150 | $179 |