Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX9
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
95 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Announced September 2018
- Superseded the Ricoh GR III
- Later Model is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
- Announced July 2010
Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX9 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Ricoh GR III versus Sony TX9, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and TX9 (12MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and TX9 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GR III was unveiled 8 years after the TX9 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony TX9 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the GR III scores against the TX9 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX9 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR III Gallery & Sony TX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Sony TX9
GR III | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2018 | July 2010 | More modern by 101 months | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 922k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX9 over the Ricoh GR III
TX9 | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Sony TX9
GR III | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX9 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR III provides outside measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Sony TX9 has sizing of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR III versus Sony TX9 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the GR III and the TX9.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the GR III and TX9 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX9 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes merely by looking through specs. The image here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the GR III and TX9.
All in all, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR III with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Ricoh GR III will render more detail having an extra 12MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The fresher GR III should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Sony TX9 Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2018-09-25 | 2010-07-08 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus range | 6cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (50 fps), 1440 x 1080 (50, 25fps), 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 257 gr (0.57 pounds) | 149 gr (0.33 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $900 | $799 |