Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-330
96 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 121g - 90 x 52 x 19mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus VR-320
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
The following is a detailed assessment of the Casio EX-Z90 and Olympus VR-330, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-Z90 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is relatively similar and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z90 was released 17 months before the VR-330 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-Z90 scores versus the VR-330 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z90 and Olympus VR-330. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z90 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z90 over the Olympus VR-330
| EX-Z90 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Casio EX-Z90
| VR-330 | EX-Z90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2011 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 17 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z90 and Olympus VR-330
| EX-Z90 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z90 offers exterior dimensions of 90mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-330 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z90 and Olympus VR-330 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the EX-Z90 compared to the VR-330.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z90 and VR-330 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading technical specs. The pic below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z90 and VR-330.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should count on the Olympus VR-330 to deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z90 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-08-18 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 4 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121 gr (0.27 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 52 x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-60 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $150 | $220 |