Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-340
96 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
96 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 121g - 90 x 52 x 19mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-Z90 versus Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z90 (12MP) and VR-340 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z90 was revealed 3 years earlier than the VR-340 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-Z90 matches up vs the VR-340 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z90 and Olympus VR-340. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z90 Gallery and Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z90 over the Olympus VR-340
| EX-Z90 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Casio EX-Z90
| VR-340 | EX-Z90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 29 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z90 and Olympus VR-340
| EX-Z90 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z90 provides physical measurements of 90mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Olympus VR-340 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z90 versus Olympus VR-340 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z90 vs the VR-340.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z90 and VR-340 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements simply by researching technical specs. The visual below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z90 and VR-340.
As you can tell, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus VR-340 to result in more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older EX-Z90 will be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Olympus VR-340 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-08-18 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121 gr (0.27 lbs) | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 52 x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-60 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $150 | $130 |