Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB2200F
96 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b663/6b663d3ae76c6d6fac0b0f755878af948f202597" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z90 front Casio Exilim EX-Z90 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba44a/ba44a222150612400a1bd4c12a80aaa4b3435771" alt="Samsung WB2200F front Samsung WB2200F front"
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 121g - 90 x 52 x 19mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Revealed January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Casio EX-Z90 and Samsung WB2200F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z90 (12MP) and WB2200F (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The EX-Z90 was introduced 5 years before the WB2200F which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z90 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-Z90 matches up against the WB2200F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z90 and Samsung WB2200F. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z90 Gallery and Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z90 over the Samsung WB2200F
EX-Z90 | WB2200F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Casio EX-Z90
WB2200F | EX-Z90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | ![]() | August 2009 | Newer by 53 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z90 and Samsung WB2200F
EX-Z90 | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z90 provides exterior measurements of 90mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has specifications of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") and a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z90 and Samsung WB2200F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z90 compared to the WB2200F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5407b/5407b68ea920f3bd050f877f864b3959d347c74b" alt="Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z90 and WB2200F is 96 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/914dd/914dd88f881bf0e849bcb546dfff9aa149b5d531" alt="Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specifications. The pic here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z90 and WB2200F.
Plainly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You should expect to see the Samsung WB2200F to result in extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z90 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f20d8/f20d850c2e754d574ed49cd5f734889734d5af74" alt="Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c63cf/c63cf9abd4b6b03f93a35104cdf13f172edc979d" alt="Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Samsung WB2200F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Samsung WB2200F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-08-18 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 4 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dot |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 1/8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lb) | 708 grams (1.56 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 90 x 52 x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-60 | BP-1410 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $150 | $599 |