Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB750
96 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
93 Imaging
37 Features
50 Overall
42
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 121g - 90 x 52 x 19mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Introduced September 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB750, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z90 (12MP) and the WB750 (13MP) is pretty close and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z90 was launched 24 months earlier than the WB750 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-Z90 scores versus the WB750 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z90 & Samsung WB750. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z90 Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z90 over the Samsung WB750
| EX-Z90 | WB750 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Casio EX-Z90
| WB750 | EX-Z90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2011 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 24 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z90 and Samsung WB750
| EX-Z90 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z90 enjoys external dimensions of 90mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB750 has proportions of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB750 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z90 and the WB750.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z90 and WB750 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions only by researching specifications. The image below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z90 and WB750.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Samsung WB750 to render extra detail utilizing its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z90 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z90 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Samsung WB750 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-08-18 | 2011-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121g (0.27 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 52 x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-60 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $150 | $339 |
