Casio EX-Z90 vs Sony H50
96 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
![Casio Exilim EX-Z90 front Casio Exilim EX-Z90 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z90/Casio-EX-Z90-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H50/Sony-H50-front.jpg)
69 Imaging
32 Features
25 Overall
29
Casio EX-Z90 vs Sony H50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 121g - 90 x 52 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-465mm (F2.7-4.5) lens
- 547g - 116 x 81 x 86mm
- Announced January 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z90 vs Sony H50 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Casio EX-Z90 vs Sony H50, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Sony. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the EX-Z90 (12MP) and H50 (9MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The EX-Z90 was introduced 8 months later than the H50 and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-Z90 grades versus the H50 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z90 vs Sony H50 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z90 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z90 Gallery and Sony H50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z90 over the Sony H50
EX-Z90 | H50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2009 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Sony H50 over the Casio EX-Z90
H50 | EX-Z90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z90 and Sony H50
EX-Z90 | H50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z90 vs Sony H50 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z90 enjoys outer measurements of 90mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Sony H50 has sizing of 116mm x 81mm x 86mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.4") with a weight of 547 grams (1.21 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z90 vs Sony H50 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z90 vs the H50.
![Casio EX-Z90 vs Sony H50 size comparison Casio EX-Z90 vs Sony H50 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z90-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H50-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z90 and H50 is 96 and 69 respectively.
![Casio EX-Z90 vs Sony H50 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z90 vs Sony H50 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z90-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H50-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-Z90 vs Sony H50 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements merely by researching technical specs. The photograph underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z90 and H50.
As you can tell, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Casio EX-Z90 to result in more detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more modern EX-Z90 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
![Casio EX-Z90 vs Sony H50 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z90 vs Sony H50 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z90-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H50-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-Z90 vs Sony H50 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-Z90 vs Sony H50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z90 vs Sony H50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z90-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H50-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z90 vs Sony H50 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Sony |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-08-18 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 4 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 31-465mm (15.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.7-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 9.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480, 30 fps, 320 x 240, 8 fps |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 121g (0.27 pounds) | 547g (1.21 pounds) |
Dimensions | 90 x 52 x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") | 116 x 81 x 86mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-60 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $150 | $80 |