Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm XP200
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d618a/d618a1cb317f56983c25f7314e57ee280dbbddf5" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8dbe/a8dbe87a76c6df650205e9886425d34d8f395a25" alt="Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm XP200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Revealed March 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm XP200 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Casio EX-ZR10 versus Fujifilm XP200, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and FujiFilm. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The EX-ZR10 was released 3 years earlier than the Fujifilm XP200 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-ZR10 scores versus the Fujifilm XP200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm XP200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Fujifilm FinePix XP200. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Fujifilm XP200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Fujifilm XP200
EX-ZR10 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Casio EX-ZR10
Fujifilm XP200 | EX-ZR10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2013 | ![]() | September 2010 | Fresher by 30 months |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Fujifilm XP200
EX-ZR10 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm XP200 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR10 offers external measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Fujifilm XP200 has dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR10 versus Fujifilm XP200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR10 vs the Fujifilm XP200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5592e/5592e6ec27004987d3317fd9cf2e5030f83168e8" alt="Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm XP200 size comparison Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm XP200 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR10 and Fujifilm XP200 is 93 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/897e5/897e5ebbf0bf18ea4ea8a7e7ed78c20172107778" alt="Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm XP200 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm XP200 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm XP200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading technical specs. The visual below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR10 and Fujifilm XP200.
As you can tell, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Fujifilm XP200 to offer you more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The older EX-ZR10 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fff2d/fff2df5fee798de25d0c15b00a8da56a311a1a4d" alt="Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm XP200 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm XP200 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm XP200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e3e3/0e3e37d1bd177d9951d67ca275a512c08599af7c" alt="Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm XP200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm XP200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Fujifilm XP200 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2013-03-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.9-4.9 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176 gr (0.39 lb) | 232 gr (0.51 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-110 | NP-50A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $190 | $250 |