Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus FE-5020
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also referred to as X-935
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus FE-5020, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and the FE-5020 (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR10 was unveiled 15 months after the FE-5020 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the EX-ZR10 matches up versus the FE-5020 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus FE-5020 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Olympus FE-5020. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Olympus FE-5020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Olympus FE-5020
| EX-ZR10 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2010 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 15 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Casio EX-ZR10
| FE-5020 | EX-ZR10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Olympus FE-5020
| EX-ZR10 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR10 has physical measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-5020 has dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus FE-5020 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR10 and the FE-5020.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR10 and FE-5020 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions only by viewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR10 and FE-5020.
Clearly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution and you can expect comparable quality of photos although you really should consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The fresher EX-ZR10 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Olympus FE-5020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Olympus FE-5020 |
| Also Known as | - | X-935 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176g (0.39 lb) | 137g (0.30 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card, microSD |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $190 | $160 |