Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35


72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Lets look much closer at the Casio EX-ZR10 and Olympus SP-565UZ, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and the SP-565UZ (10MP) is very well matched and they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR10 was manufactured 21 months later than the SP-565UZ making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-ZR10 matches up against the SP-565UZ when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 and Olympus SP-565UZ. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
EX-ZR10 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 21 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Casio EX-ZR10
SP-565UZ | EX-ZR10 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Olympus SP-565UZ
EX-ZR10 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR10 offers outside measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has sizing of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR10 and Olympus SP-565UZ in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR10 and the SP-565UZ.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR10 and SP-565UZ is 93 and 72 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing just by looking at specs. The visual below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR10 and SP-565UZ.
All in all, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR10 to give greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos far more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR10 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2009-01-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176 gr (0.39 lbs) | 413 gr (0.91 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 30 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-110 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $190 | $400 |