Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus 8010
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
92 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Announced February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus 8010 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus 8010, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and the 8010 (13MP) is fairly well matched and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR10 was released 8 months later than the 8010 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the EX-ZR10 scores vs the 8010 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus 8010 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Olympus Stylus Tough 8010. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Olympus 8010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Olympus 8010
| EX-ZR10 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2010 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 8 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Casio EX-ZR10
| 8010 | EX-ZR10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Olympus 8010
| EX-ZR10 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR10 features external measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus 8010 has proportions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus 8010 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR10 against the 8010.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR10 and 8010 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading through specs. The photograph below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR10 and 8010.
As you can plainly see, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus 8010 to resolve more detail as a result of its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR10 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus 8010 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 |
| Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 8010 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $190 | $600 |