Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
93 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR10 and Olympus TG-2 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR10 was launched 3 years prior to the TG-2 iHS which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR10 matches up against the TG-2 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 and Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery and Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| EX-ZR10 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR10
| TG-2 iHS | EX-ZR10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2013 |  | September 2010 | More modern by 33 months |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 461k | Clearer screen (+149k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| EX-ZR10 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR10 features physical measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus TG-2 iHS has dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR10 and Olympus TG-2 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR10 versus the TG-2 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR10 and TG-2 iHS is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specifications. The pic here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR10 and TG-2 iHS.
To sum up, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same MP therefore you should expect similar quality of images though you will need to take the production date of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-ZR10 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $190 | $380 |