Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-330
93 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
94 Imaging
36 Features
38 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus VR-320
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-ZR10 versus Olympus VR-330, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is pretty well matched and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR10 was unveiled 4 months earlier than the VR-330 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-ZR10 grades versus the VR-330 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Olympus VR-330. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Olympus VR-330
| EX-ZR10 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Casio EX-ZR10
| VR-330 | EX-ZR10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Olympus VR-330
| EX-ZR10 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2010 |  | February 2011 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera often, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR10 provides outside measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-330 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR10 versus Olympus VR-330 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR10 versus the VR-330.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR10 and VR-330 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions merely by checking a spec sheet. The picture below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR10 and VR-330.
As you can see, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus VR-330 to give you greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176g (0.39 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $190 | $220 |