Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Announced March 2010
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Casio EX-ZR10 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-ZR10 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") feature totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR10 was launched 7 months later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR10 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-ZR10 grades vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
EX-ZR10 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2010 | March 2010 | Fresher by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Casio EX-ZR10
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | EX-ZR10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 461k | Clearer display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
EX-ZR10 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR10 has external measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR10 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR10 versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR10 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 93 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizing just by looking at technical specs. The graphic here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR10 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you have seen, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR10 due to its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh harder and the Casio EX-ZR10 will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR10 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2010-03-18 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176 gr (0.39 pounds) | 355 gr (0.78 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-110 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $190 | $349 |