Sony NEX-3N vs Sony A6300
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
83 Imaging
67 Features
82 Overall
73
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Released February 2013
- Old Model is Sony NEX-F3
- Successor is Sony a5000
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Replaced the Sony A6000
- Later Model is Sony A6500
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Sony NEX-3N vs Sony A6300 Overview
The following is a extended review of the Sony NEX-3N vs Sony A6300, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless and both are offered by Sony. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the NEX-3N (16MP) and A6300 (24MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor size (APS-C).
Photography GlossaryThe NEX-3N was unveiled 3 years earlier than the A6300 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the NEX-3N matches up versus the A6300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Sony NEX-3N vs Sony A6300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Sony Alpha NEX-3N & Sony Alpha a6300. The full galleries are available at Sony NEX-3N Gallery & Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Sony A6300
| NEX-3N | A6300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Sony NEX-3N
| A6300 | NEX-3N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | February 2013 | Newer by 35 months |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Sony NEX-3N and Sony A6300
| NEX-3N | A6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Tilting | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Sony NEX-3N offers physical measurements of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Sony A6300 has sizing of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Contrast the Sony NEX-3N vs Sony A6300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the NEX-3N versus the A6300.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the NEX-3N and A6300 is 89 and 83 respectively.
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor dimensions merely by going through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the NEX-3N and A6300.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Sony A6300 to show more detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged NEX-3N will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony A6300 Specifications
| Sony Alpha NEX-3N | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
| Model | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | Sony Alpha a6300 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2013-02-25 | 2016-02-03 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Bionz | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4912 x 3264 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max native ISO | 16000 | 25600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 425 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Sony E | Sony E |
| Available lenses | 121 | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | - | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 269g (0.59 pounds) | 404g (0.89 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 74 | 85 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | 24.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | 13.7 |
| DXO Low light score | 1067 | 1437 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 480 photos | 400 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NPFW50 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $399 | $889 |