Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-4
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Casio EX-ZR10 and Ricoh WG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR10 was launched 4 years prior to the WG-4 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-ZR10 scores vs the WG-4 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 and Ricoh WG-4. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Ricoh WG-4
| EX-ZR10 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Casio EX-ZR10
| WG-4 | EX-ZR10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | September 2010 | Fresher by 41 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Ricoh WG-4
| EX-ZR10 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR10 comes with physical dimensions of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR10 and Ricoh WG-4 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR10 compared to the WG-4.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR10 and WG-4 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing simply by going through technical specs. The visual here will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR10 and WG-4.
As you have seen, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-4 to produce extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-ZR10 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176g (0.39 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $190 | $330 |