Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-50
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR10 and Ricoh WG-50, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR10 was revealed 7 years earlier than the WG-50 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-ZR10 scores versus the WG-50 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Ricoh WG-50. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Ricoh WG-50
| EX-ZR10 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-ZR10
| WG-50 | EX-ZR10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 |  | September 2010 | Newer by 81 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Ricoh WG-50
| EX-ZR10 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR10 provides outside dimensions of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR10 and Ricoh WG-50 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR10 and the WG-50.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR10 and WG-50 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over a spec sheet. The picture underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR10 and WG-50.
Clearly, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-50 to offer greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR10 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2017-05-24 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176g (0.39 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $190 | $280 |