Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-50
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR10 and Ricoh WG-50, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR10 was revealed 7 years earlier than the WG-50 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-ZR10 scores versus the WG-50 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Ricoh WG-50. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Ricoh WG-50
| EX-ZR10 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-ZR10
| WG-50 | EX-ZR10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 | September 2010 | Newer by 81 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Ricoh WG-50
| EX-ZR10 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR10 provides outside dimensions of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR10 and Ricoh WG-50 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR10 and the WG-50.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR10 and WG-50 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over a spec sheet. The picture underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR10 and WG-50.
Clearly, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-50 to offer greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR10 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2017-05-24 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176g (0.39 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $190 | $280 |