Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
90 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 300g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Alternate Name is Wi-Fi
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera: A Hands-On Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
Whether you’re expanding your camera arsenal or moving on from your smartphone, choosing the right compact camera can shape your creative journey. Today, we delve deep into two compelling small-sensor compacts: the Casio EX-ZR10, launched in 2010, and the more recent (2013) Samsung Galaxy Camera. While both are compacts sporting fixed zoom lenses and share the same 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor size, they serve quite different creative needs and styles. With our extensive hands-on experience with thousands of cameras, this in-depth comparison uncovers which one fits your photography goals across genres, technical performance, and practical usage.
First impressions: Size, Design, and Build Quality
The physical handling of a camera strongly influences your shooting comfort and spontaneity, especially in street or travel photography.
| Feature | Casio EX-ZR10 | Samsung Galaxy Camera |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (mm) | 102 x 69 x 27 | 129 x 71 x 19 |
| Weight (g) | 176 | 300 |
| Body type | Compact | Compact |
| Controls | Physical buttons, no touchscreen | Touchscreen with physical buttons |

The Casio EX-ZR10 impresses with a compact and lightweight build that fits comfortably in one hand or a jacket pocket. Despite a thicker profile (27mm), it balances well and encourages mobility. Meanwhile, Samsung has pushed the envelope for a “camera-smartphone hybrid,” translating to a notably larger footprint and heavier weight at 300g. Its slimmer body (19mm) leans toward a tablet-like feel but packs a large 4.8" touchscreen, which impacts portability.
The Casio’s top control layout is straightforward but minimalistic, relying mainly on tactile buttons and a small 3” fixed LCD without touchscreen functionality. Samsung gives you a large, bright touchscreen display with intuitive menu navigation reminiscent of a smartphone experience.

In terms of build quality, neither camera is weather sealed, so outdoor enthusiasts working in challenging conditions should prioritize care or protective accessories.
Sensor and Image Quality: What Your Pixels Deliver
Both cameras share a 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor, which is standard in compact cameras. However, resolution and image processing have significant bearing on your results.
| Feature | Casio EX-ZR10 | Samsung Galaxy Camera |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) |
| Resolution (megapixels) | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| Max ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Raw support | No | No |
| Anti-aliasing filter | Yes | Yes |

In controlled lab tests and practical shooting, higher resolution theoretically enables better cropping and detail retention. However, increased megapixels on a small sensor can lead to higher noise, especially at elevated ISOs.
In side-by-side shooting at base ISO 100, the Samsung Galaxy Camera produces slightly sharper details thanks to the higher pixel density, but this advantage diminishes in low light where noise becomes more noticeable. The Casio EX-ZR10 exhibits cleaner images at ISO 800 and above, a testament to its older yet efficient processing with the Exilim Engine HS.
Neither camera offers RAW capture, limiting post-processing latitude. If you rely heavily on editing flexibility, these compacts won’t meet professional demands but do well for straightforward JPEG shooters.
Framing Your Shot: Display and Viewfinder Experience
For composing your images, display quality and eye-level viewfinders matter.
| Feature | Casio EX-ZR10 | Samsung Galaxy Camera |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3.0" Super Clear TFT LCD | 4.8" HD Super Clear Touch LCD |
| Screen resolution | 461k pixels | 922k pixels |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Viewfinder | None | None |

Samsung’s 4.8" touchscreen is a highlight, offering instant touch focus and menu control, reducing reliance on physical controls. This is great for vloggers or those migrating from smartphones. On the flip side, the large screen can be unwieldy for street and travel photography where discretion and quick responsiveness matter.
The Casio’s 3.0" Super Clear TFT panel, though smaller, is bright and responsive with direct physical controls providing tactile reassurance. Neither camera includes an electronic viewfinder, which may limit visibility in bright sunlight.
If you prioritize interaction with menus and live previews, Samsung wins here. But if you want a camera that stays out of the way, Casio’s simpler screen might favor you.
Versatile Zoom and Lens Performance
Lens sharpness and zoom range are critical, tailored to various creative genres.
| Specification | Casio EX-ZR10 | Samsung Galaxy Camera |
|---|---|---|
| Focal length range | 28-196mm (7x optical zoom) | 23-481mm (20.9x optical zoom) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0 - f/5.9 | f/2.8 - f/5.9 |
| Image stabilization | Sensor-shift (mechanical) | Optical stabilization |
| Macro focus range | Not specified | Not specified |
Both cameras focus on versatility with their built-in zooms. The Samsung’s 20.9x zoom (23-481mm) outstrips Casio’s modest 7x zoom (28-196mm) - an essential advantage for wildlife and sports shooters who need reach without carrying extra lenses.
The Samsung lens also starts brighter at f/2.8 on the wide end, allowing more light in for low-light shooting and better background blur - a boon for portraits and creative expression. Casio’s f/3.0-5.9 range is relatively narrow but still useful for casual everyday shooting.
Image stabilization is present in both, but Samsung’s optical stabilization offers better control for telephoto end shooting, reducing blur in handheld shots at long focal lengths.
If you aim to shoot wildlife or distant subjects, the Samsung Galaxy Camera’s extensive zoom range and better stabilization make it the standout. For casual travel or street photographers who rarely exceed moderate zoom, the Casio is easier to handle and provides good quality in that range.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed, Accuracy & Focus Modes
Autofocus systems can make or break your experience, especially with moving subjects or low-light conditions.
| Feature | Casio EX-ZR10 | Samsung Galaxy Camera |
|---|---|---|
| Autofocus type | Contrast-detection | Contrast-detection |
| AF modes available | Single AF, Multi-area AF | Not specified; basic AF only |
| Continuous AF | No | No |
| AF tracking | Yes (multi-area) | No |
| Manual focus | Yes | Yes |
| Face detection | No | No |
Neither camera employs advanced phase-detection autofocus or eye tracking, a limitation noticeable during fast action shooting or complex backgrounds.
The Casio EX-ZR10’s multi-area contrast AF with tracking allows a bit more confidence in following moving subjects. The Samsung’s AF is simpler with single area focus and less flexibility.
In practical use, both cameras struggle to keep up with fast subjects like sports or wildlife, where dedicated phase-detection systems are preferred. The EX-ZR10 is moderately quicker to lock focus but less consistent in dim lighting. Samsung’s focus tends to hunt more due to its processing overhead for the touchscreen.
For portraits, manual focus and single AF modes work well at moderate distances, but neither camera is ideal for rapid, unpredictable autofocus scenarios.
Image Stabilization and Low-Light Capability
Both cameras incorporate image stabilization to combat handheld shake.
- Casio EX-ZR10 uses sensor-shift stabilization, useful across the zoom range.
- Samsung Galaxy Camera offers optical image stabilization integrated within the lens assembly, generally more effective especially at long focal lengths.
In low-light handheld shooting, Samsung’s optical IS provides a noticeable edge, producing sharper images at slower shutter speeds and higher zoom. However, noise at high ISO remains a limiting factor on both models.
Maximum ISO settings of 3200 are nominal but effective usability typically caps out around ISO 800-1600 depending on the tolerance for noise.
If you frequently shoot indoor events or dim environments without flash, Samsung’s stabilization advantage plays a critical role.
Video Capabilities: Resolution, Formats, and Extras
Video quality and features have grown into a pivotal role for many content creators.
| Feature | Casio EX-ZR10 | Samsung Galaxy Camera |
|---|---|---|
| Max video resolution | Full HD 1920x1080 at 30fps | Full HD 1920x1080 at 30fps |
| Video formats | H.264 | H.264, MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | No | Yes |
| Headphone port | No | No |
| Slow motion | Yes (up to 480 fps low-res) | No |
| Touchscreen video control | No | Yes |
Samsung Galaxy Camera feels more future-focused for multimedia. The 4.8" touchscreen facilitates easy framing and focus adjustments in video mode, plus it offers a microphone input port - a boon for vloggers aiming for cleaner sound.
The Casio’s video capabilities are good for basic Full HD capture, with a unique bonus of slow-motion high frame rates at reduced resolution, ideal for creative effects.
Neither camera supports 4K or advanced frame-rate options. For casual video use, Samsung wins on ergonomics and audio inputs, while Casio offers quirky slow-motion modes for fun experiments.
Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity
| Feature | Casio EX-ZR10 | Samsung Galaxy Camera |
|---|---|---|
| Battery model | NP-110 | Proprietary (unspecified) |
| Battery life estimate | Moderate (typical compacts) | Moderate |
| Storage type | SD / SDHC / SDXC | microSD / microSDHC / microSDXC |
| Wireless connectivity | None | Built-in Wi-Fi, GPS |
| USB port | USB 2.0 | None |
| HDMI out | Yes | Yes |
The Casio relies on a physical USB 2.0 port for file transfers, and standard SD cards are compatible. Samsung moves to microSD to save space, but lacks USB connectivity, instead depending on Wi-Fi for file sharing.
Samsung’s built-in Wi-Fi opens possibilities for instant sharing, remote shooting, and geotagging thanks to integrated GPS, features that appeal to travel and social media photographers.
Battery life is roughly comparable but expect to recharge more often with Samsung’s bright touchscreen and always-on wireless. Casio’s fewer power-hungry features may last longer on a single charge.
Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres
Let’s tailor practical advice for users interested in various photography disciplines based on our hands-on review:
| Genre | Casio EX-ZR10 | Samsung Galaxy Camera |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Moderate bokeh capability, no face detection | Better wide aperture for background blur, limited AF |
| Landscape | Sharp optics in mid zoom, no weather sealing | Wide zoom, good for varied focal lengths, no sealing |
| Wildlife | Limited zoom & AF speed | Excellent zoom and better stabilization |
| Sports | Slow focus, limited burst | Similar AF limitations but longer reach valuable |
| Street | Compact size aids discretion | Bulkier size less discreet; touchscreen less practical |
| Macro | No specialized mode or macro | No dedicated macro; manual focus only |
| Night / Astro | Moderate ISO performance | Poor noise control beyond ISO 800 |
| Video | Basic Full HD + slow motion | Better interface, mic input, and stabilization |
| Travel | Lightweight, easy to carry | Versatile zoom, GPS, wifi for sharing |
| Pro Work | Limited file flexibility, no RAW | Same; mainly for casual use and content sharing |
Wrapping Up: Value and Recommendations
| Category | Casio EX-ZR10 | Samsung Galaxy Camera |
|---|---|---|
| Launch price | $189.81 | $449.99 |
| Strengths | Compact, easy handling, clean images | Superb zoom, touchscreen, connectivity |
| Weaknesses | Limited zoom & manual controls, no Wi-Fi | Bulky, slower AF, larger size |
| Ideal user | Beginner to casual shooter valuing portability | Enthusiast looking for zoom versatility and multimedia features |
Based on our extensive testing and analysis, here are some clear recommendations:
-
Pick the Casio EX-ZR10 if:
- You want a truly pocketable, lightweight camera for day-to-day shooting
- You prioritize clean image quality over zoom or video features
- You prefer tactile physical controls and a classic point-and-shoot experience
- Budget is a primary concern
-
Consider the Samsung Galaxy Camera if:
- You crave a superzoom experience to capture wildlife or distant subjects
- You value connectivity options for on-the-go sharing and GPS geo-tagging
- Video recording with an external mic is important to your workflow
- You don’t mind carrying a larger camera and prefer touchscreen controls
Genre-Specific Insights: Which Camera Does What Best?
- For street photographers, Casio's small size and discreet look are a plus, while Samsung's touchscreen and size may draw unwanted attention.
- Landscape shooters can exploit Samsung’s wider zoom and higher res for compositions but be mindful of noise at higher ISO.
- Wildlife and sports fans will appreciate the Galaxy's reach and stabilization, though neither camera is ideal for very fast-action work.
- Macro enthusiasts will find limited utility in both cameras given lack of dedicated macro modes.
- Night and Astro photographers must manage expectations; both cameras struggle beyond moderate ISO, but Casio’s cleaner low-light images give it a slight edge.
- For video focused users, Samsung is the clear winner due to mic input, touchscreen ease, and steady Full HD.
Final Thoughts: Explore, Experiment, Create
Choosing between the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung Galaxy Camera boils down to how and where you shoot, plus your creative priorities.
With the Casio EX-ZR10, you gain a compact, light, efficient compact camera with simple controls and respectable image quality. It’s a trusty companion for budgets and those valuing pocketability and straightforward performance.
The Samsung Galaxy Camera, on the other hand, embraces the smart device revolution with touchscreen interaction, connectivity, and an impressive zoom. It invites experimental, multimedia-driven photographers who prioritize reach and sharing over compactness.
These two compacts might not replace professional gear, but they open gateways for creativity in different directions.
We encourage you to handle both cameras if possible, test their shooting experience, and see which clicks for your photography style. Consider complementing your choice with the right accessories - extra memory cards, protective cases, or tripod adaptations - to get the most from your investment.
Ready to dive into your next camera? Check out our gallery of sample images, user tips, and lens guides linked below to keep your learning smooth and enjoyable. Your creative journey starts with a single frame - make it count.
Disclosure: We conducted this comparison after rigorous in-house testing under standardized conditions. Our aim is to help you make informed, confident gear choices.
Related Resources:
- How to maximize image quality on small sensor cameras
- Tips for shooting wildlife with compact zoom cameras
- Best accessories for compact travel photography
Thank you for trusting our expertise. Happy shooting!
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung Galaxy Camera | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung Galaxy Camera |
| Alternate name | - | Wi-Fi |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2013-02-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 4.8 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176g (0.39 pounds) | 300g (0.66 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $190 | $450 |