Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL225
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2009
- Additionally Known as ST550
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung TL225, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is relatively close and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR10 was unveiled 14 months later than the TL225 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-ZR10 scores versus the TL225 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Samsung TL225. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Samsung TL225
EX-ZR10 | TL225 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2010 | August 2009 | More recent by 14 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Casio EX-ZR10
TL225 | EX-ZR10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1152k | 461k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung TL225
EX-ZR10 | TL225 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR10 offers outside measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL225 has measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") with a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung TL225 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR10 against the TL225.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR10 and TL225 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing specifications. The photograph underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR10 and TL225.
Plainly, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP and you can expect comparable quality of pictures although you will want to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The newer EX-ZR10 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung TL225 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung TL225 |
Also referred to as | - | ST550 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2009-08-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 1,152k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176g (0.39 lb) | 187g (0.41 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-110 | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $190 | $488 |