Clicky

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB2200F

Portability
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 front
 
Samsung WB2200F front
Portability
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
  • Revealed September 2010
Samsung WB2200F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview

Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung WB2200F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and WB2200F (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The EX-ZR10 was revealed 4 years before the WB2200F which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the EX-ZR10 scores vs the WB2200F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Samsung WB2200F

		

		

			
 EX-ZR10 WB2200F 
Display resolution461k460kClearer display (+1k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Casio EX-ZR10

		

		

			
 WB2200F EX-ZR10 
IntroducedJanuary 2014September 2010More modern by 40 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung WB2200F

		

		

			
 EX-ZR10 WB2200F 
Focus manually  Very precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display measurements
Selfie screen  Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Neither features Touch friendly display
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR10 enjoys outer dimensions of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has proportions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") and a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung WB2200F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR10 compared to the WB2200F.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR10 and WB2200F is 93 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
In many cases, it's hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes simply by looking at specs. The picture here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR10 and WB2200F.
All in all, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You should anticipate the Samsung WB2200F to give you extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images way more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR10 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
	
			Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR10 as a Portrait photography camera
 Samsung WB2200F as a Portrait photography camera
27
 you can focus manually
 manual exposure not possible
 no external flash support
 sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
44
 manual focus
 decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
 supports face detection focus
 external flash not possible
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Street Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR10 as a Street photography camera
 Samsung WB2200F as a Street photography camera
56
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 fixed screen
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
40
 image stabilization (Optical)
 screen is fixed
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW support
 more heavy than average (708g)
Photography Glossary
Sports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR10
Sports photography with Samsung WB2200F
34
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports tracking autofocus
 lack of shutter priority mode
 sensor resolution not great (12MP)
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have phase detect autofocus
53
 great zoom range (20-1200mm  60.0 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
 supports tracking autofocus
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Travel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR10
Travel photography with Samsung WB2200F
57
 has built in flash
 really wide (28mm)
 missing Timelapse recording
 sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
51
 decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 really wide (20mm)
 great reach (1200mm)
 does not have Timelapse function
 more heavy than average (708 grams)
 does not have selfie friendly screen
 sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Landscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR10 Landscape photography features
Samsung WB2200F Landscape photography features
41
 you can focus manually
 really wide (28mm)
 screen size is decent (3 inch)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
 manual exposure not possible
 sensor resolution not great (12MP)
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
 missing Timelapse recording
46
 manual focus
 really wide (20mm)
 screen is a decent size (3")
 image stabilization (Optical)
 decent megapixels (16MP)
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW support
 does not have Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR10 Vlogging features
Samsung WB2200F Vlogging features
32
 really wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 missing external microphone jack
25
 really wide (20mm)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 supports face detection focus
 video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
 does not have selfie friendly screen
 does not have external microphone jack
 more heavy than average (708 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	

		

			
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung WB2200F
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR10Samsung WB2200F
General Information
Make Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 Samsung WB2200F
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2010-09-20 2014-01-07
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3 and  16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Touch focus    
AF continuous    
AF single    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
Center weighted AF    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detection AF    
Contract detection AF    
Phase detection AF    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-196mm (7.0x) 20-1200mm (60.0x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range - 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 461k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch screen    
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 200k dot
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 1/8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance - 6.00 m (ISO Auto)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix
External flash    
AEB    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 176 gr (0.39 lbs) 708 gr (1.56 lbs)
Physical dimensions 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-110 BP-1410
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) -
Time lapse feature    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD, SDHC, SCXC
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $190 $599