Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB50F
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB50F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR10 was unveiled 4 years before the WB50F and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-ZR10 matches up against the WB50F for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Samsung WB50F. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Samsung WB50F
| EX-ZR10 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-ZR10
| WB50F | EX-ZR10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | September 2010 | Fresher by 40 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung WB50F
| EX-ZR10 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR10 provides outer measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Samsung WB50F has sizing of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB50F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR10 against the WB50F.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR10 and WB50F is 93 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through specifications. The photograph here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR10 and WB50F.
To sum up, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Samsung WB50F to give extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older EX-ZR10 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung WB50F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176 gr (0.39 lbs) | 207 gr (0.46 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $190 | $180 |