Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm S3200
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/109d1/109d1949782e31ac5d25697e8a75aabcf5d97273" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/790eb/790ebf9f1c055bb20952ab493f1b953637d75289" alt="FujiFilm FinePix S3200 front FujiFilm FinePix S3200 front"
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm S3200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix S3250
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm S3200 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm S3200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the S3200 (14MP) is relatively close and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The EX-ZR100 was unveiled 7 months after the S3200 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR100 being a Compact camera and the FujiFilm S3200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-ZR100 grades vs the S3200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm S3200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & FujiFilm FinePix S3200. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & FujiFilm S3200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the FujiFilm S3200
EX-ZR100 | S3200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 7 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S3200 over the Casio EX-ZR100
S3200 | EX-ZR100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and FujiFilm S3200
EX-ZR100 | S3200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm S3200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR100 offers external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the FujiFilm S3200 has measurements of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") and a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm S3200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR100 against the S3200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/650e7/650e7fc2fc522bc313d3305c25608326450ff645" alt="Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm S3200 size comparison Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm S3200 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR100 and S3200 is 92 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6570/a65706f2774c64c8898db84b3d0d29662ca35722" alt="Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm S3200 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm S3200 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm S3200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching technical specs. The image here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR100 and S3200.
As you have seen, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the FujiFilm S3200 to provide you with more detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR100 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/017fa/017fad6a2fa695d092823ffe5609d92d8251746b" alt="Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm S3200 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm S3200 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm S3200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/922ea/922eaf4f9ccb82f98d8dc2eda0bb248fe63b6391" alt="Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm S3200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm S3200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR100 vs FujiFilm S3200 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | FujiFilm FinePix S3200 |
Also Known as | - | FinePix S3250 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-576mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 97% |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 7.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 204 gr (0.45 lb) | 540 gr (1.19 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
Battery type | - | AA |
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD / SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $300 | $190 |