Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak C135
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak C135 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak C135 Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak C135, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the C135 (14MP) is relatively close and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR100 was revealed 5 months prior to the C135 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summation of how the EX-ZR100 grades versus the C135 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak C135 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 and Kodak EasyShare C135. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery and Kodak C135 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Kodak C135
| EX-ZR100 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 112k | Sharper screen (+349k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| C135 | EX-ZR100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Kodak C135
| EX-ZR100 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 | January 2012 | Same generation | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak C135 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR100 features outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Kodak C135 has sizing of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak C135 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR100 vs the C135.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR100 and C135 is 92 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak C135 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes simply by viewing specifications. The pic underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR100 and C135.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Kodak C135 to result in greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures far more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak C135 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak C135 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Kodak EasyShare C135 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Kodak EasyShare C135 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1250 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.4 inches |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 112 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 204 grams (0.45 lbs) | 175 grams (0.39 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $0 |