Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-4000
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Alternative Name is X-925
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Olympus FE-4000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the FE-4000 (12MP) is relatively well matched and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR100 was manufactured 2 years later than the FE-4000 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the EX-ZR100 matches up versus the FE-4000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-4000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Olympus FE-4000. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Olympus FE-4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Olympus FE-4000
| EX-ZR100 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 25 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| FE-4000 | EX-ZR100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus FE-4000
| EX-ZR100 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR100 enjoys outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus FE-4000 has proportions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Olympus FE-4000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR100 versus the FE-4000.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR100 and FE-4000 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading through specs. The photograph here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR100 and FE-4000.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of files however you will need to consider the age of the products into consideration. The newer EX-ZR100 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus FE-4000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus FE-4000 |
| Also called | - | X-925 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.6-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 204 grams (0.45 pounds) | 136 grams (0.30 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $130 |