Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus 7010
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39


94 Imaging
34 Features
18 Overall
27
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus 7010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 145g - 98 x 56 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 7010

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus 7010 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus 7010, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the 7010 (12MP) is very close and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR100 was manufactured 2 years after the 7010 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the EX-ZR100 grades versus the 7010 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus 7010 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Olympus Stylus 7010. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Olympus 7010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Olympus 7010
EX-ZR100 | 7010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 25 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 7010 over the Casio EX-ZR100
7010 | EX-ZR100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus 7010
EX-ZR100 | 7010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus 7010 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR100 offers outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus 7010 has proportions of 98mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus 7010 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR100 compared to the 7010.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR100 and 7010 is 92 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus 7010 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The picture below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR100 and 7010.
All in all, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of pictures however you might want to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The more recent EX-ZR100 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus 7010 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus 7010 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus Stylus 7010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus Stylus 7010 |
Also called as | - | mju 7010 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2009-07-22 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-196mm (7.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 40.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 204g (0.45 lbs) | 145g (0.32 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 56 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $300 | $200 |