Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus SH-1
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
88 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus SH-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced March 2014
- New Model is Olympus SH-2
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus SH-1 Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus SH-1, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Casio and Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and SH-1 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR100 was manufactured 3 years prior to the SH-1 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summation of how the EX-ZR100 matches up vs the SH-1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus SH-1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Olympus Stylus SH-1. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Olympus SH-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Olympus SH-1
| EX-ZR100 | SH-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| SH-1 | EX-ZR100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2014 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 32 months |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus SH-1
| EX-ZR100 | SH-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus SH-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR100 enjoys exterior measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus SH-1 has specifications of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus SH-1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR100 compared to the SH-1.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR100 and SH-1 is 92 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus SH-1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions only by viewing a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR100 and SH-1.
As you can see, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus SH-1 to render greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR100 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus SH-1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus Stylus SH-1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2014-03-31 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 204g (0.45 pounds) | 271g (0.60 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $349 |