Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus SP-820UZ
92 Imaging
36 Features
46 Overall
40
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Released August 2012
- Older Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
- Later Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Overview
Below, we are comparing the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Olympus SP-820UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the SP-820UZ (14MP) is fairly well matched and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR100 was announced 13 months prior to the SP-820UZ making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-ZR100 grades against the SP-820UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Olympus SP-820UZ
EX-ZR100 | SP-820UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Casio EX-ZR100
SP-820UZ | EX-ZR100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2012 | July 2011 | Fresher by 13 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus SP-820UZ
EX-ZR100 | SP-820UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR100 has exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus SP-820UZ has dimensions of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") along with a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Olympus SP-820UZ in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR100 compared to the SP-820UZ.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR100 and SP-820UZ is 92 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing purely by looking at specs. The graphic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR100 and SP-820UZ.
All in all, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus SP-820UZ to give more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older EX-ZR100 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2011-07-19 | 2012-08-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 22-896mm (40.7x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.4-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 40.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 15.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 204 grams (0.45 pounds) | 485 grams (1.07 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $300 | $299 |