Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL210
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/109d1/109d1949782e31ac5d25697e8a75aabcf5d97273" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37590/375904798060e97eb5dfbb02b75093afb956586f" alt="Samsung TL210 front Samsung TL210 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally referred to as PL150
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL210 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL210, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the TL210 (12MP) is pretty similar and they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The EX-ZR100 was announced 19 months after the TL210 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL210 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR100 grades versus the TL210 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL210 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 and Samsung TL210. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery and Samsung TL210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Samsung TL210
EX-ZR100 | TL210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 19 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL210 over the Casio EX-ZR100
TL210 | EX-ZR100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung TL210
EX-ZR100 | TL210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL210 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR100 enjoys outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL210 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL210 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR100 compared to the TL210.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe16b/fe16b9b454ed5c298a3186ebd0bbef4714913a68" alt="Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL210 size comparison Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL210 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR100 and TL210 is 92 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78ded/78ded1d81994bd1704e89006d18176a876370fe5" alt="Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL210 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL210 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL210 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specs. The picture below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR100 and TL210.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact MP therefore you should expect similar quality of files but you should always take the production date of the products into consideration. The fresher EX-ZR100 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59de4/59de418253eeb158abf90f0b63c7ec29f280bb4a" alt="Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL210 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL210 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL210 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39d4e/39d4efa344725305bfaf415c7bdb5c91abf5b590" alt="Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung TL210 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung TL210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung TL210 |
Alternative name | - | PL150 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3.5" |
Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 40.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 204g (0.45 lb) | 177g (0.39 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | SLB-07B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $300 | $230 |