Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB150F
Portability
92 Imaging
36 Features
46 Overall
40
92 Imaging
36 Features
46 Overall
40
Portability
93 Imaging
38 Features
42 Overall
39
93 Imaging
38 Features
42 Overall
39
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR100
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
Samsung WB150F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Below is a comprehensive review of the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung WB150F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is relatively well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR100 was brought out 5 months before the WB150F so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-ZR100 grades vs the WB150F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 and Samsung WB150F. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Samsung WB150F
| EX-ZR100 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Casio EX-ZR100
| WB150F | EX-ZR100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung WB150F
| EX-ZR100 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | January 2012 | Similar generation |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR100 has got physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung WB150F has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung WB150F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR100 vs the WB150F.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR100 and WB150F is 92 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading through specs. The graphic below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR100 and WB150F.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Samsung WB150F to resolve greater detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR100
Portrait photography with Samsung WB150F
focusing manually
can't use external flash
low MP (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
has face detection focusing
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB150F as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (204 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (188 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR100
Sports photography with Samsung WB150F
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
fast shooting (40.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking focus
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
great zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR100
Travel photography with Samsung WB150F
lighter than competitors (204 grams)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
low MP (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lighter than others (188g)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long reach (432mm)
does not have Timelapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.2)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung WB150F Landscape photography highlights
focusing manually
quite wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Timelapse recording
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
does not have Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Vlogging highlights
Samsung WB150F Vlogging highlights
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors (204g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly display
does not have microphone support
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focusing
lighter than others (188 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung WB150F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 204 gr (0.45 lb) | 188 gr (0.41 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $300 | $230 |
