Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB210
Portability
92 Imaging
36 Features
46 Overall
40
92 Imaging
36 Features
46 Overall
40
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR100
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
Samsung WB210
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Released July 2011
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung WB210, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR100 was introduced very close to the WB210 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-ZR100 scores versus the WB210 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Samsung WB210. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Samsung WB210
| EX-ZR100 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 1k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| WB210 | EX-ZR100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung WB210
| EX-ZR100 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 |  | July 2011 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you should take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR100 features outside dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has specifications of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung WB210 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR100 compared to the WB210.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR100 and WB210 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The graphic here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR100 and WB210.
Plainly, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB210 to produce greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures far more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Portrait photography features
Samsung WB210 Portrait photography features
focusing manually
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
focusing manually
decent megapixels (14MP)
features face detection autofocus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Street photography details
Samsung WB210 Street photography details
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (204 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes touch focus
lighter than others in class (174g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Sports photography highlights
Samsung WB210 Sports photography highlights
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
max frames per second high (40.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking autofocus
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR100
Travel photography with Samsung WB210
lighter than competition in class (204 grams)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
missing Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
lighter than others in class (174g)
includes touch focus
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
very long zoom (288mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung WB210 Landscape photography highlights
focusing manually
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
focusing manually
really wide (24mm)
big screen (3.5 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
manual exposure not available
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR100
Vlogging with Samsung WB210
fairly wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (204 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing external mic jack
really wide (24mm)
touch screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection autofocus
lighter than others in class (174 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung WB210 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-07-19 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 1k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 204 gr (0.45 lb) | 174 gr (0.38 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $300 | $279 |
