Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB700
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
98 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced December 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Below is a extended review of the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB700, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is very similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR100 was manufactured 7 months later than the WB700 so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR100 matches up versus the WB700 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Samsung WB700. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Samsung WB700
| EX-ZR100 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | December 2010 | More recent by 7 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| WB700 | EX-ZR100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 461k | Crisper display (+153k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung WB700
| EX-ZR100 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR100 offers physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung WB700 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB700 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR100 against the WB700.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR100 and WB700 is 92 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading technical specs. The visual below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR100 and WB700.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung WB700 to deliver greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR100 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung WB700 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2010-12-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 204g (0.45 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $300 | $300 |