Casio EX-ZR1000 vs FujiFilm S200EXR
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44


54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternative Name is FinePix S205EXR

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Casio EX-ZR1000 and FujiFilm S200EXR, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and FujiFilm. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and S200EXR (12MP) and the EX-ZR1000 (1/2.3") and S200EXR (1/1.6") possess different sensor sizing.

The EX-ZR1000 was manufactured 3 years later than the S200EXR and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR1000 being a Compact camera and the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-ZR1000 scores vs the S200EXR in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
EX-ZR1000 | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 39 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Casio EX-ZR1000
S200EXR | EX-ZR1000 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and FujiFilm S200EXR
EX-ZR1000 | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR1000 has external measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the FujiFilm S200EXR has specifications of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") and a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR1000 and FujiFilm S200EXR in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR1000 and the S200EXR.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and S200EXR is 90 and 54 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements purely by looking through technical specs. The visual underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR1000 and S200EXR.
As you can tell, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR1000 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Casio EX-ZR1000 will provide you with greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR1000 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR |
Alternative name | - | FinePix S205EXR |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-09-25 | 2009-07-22 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | EXR |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 31-436mm (14.1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.3 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 7.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 255 gr (0.56 lbs) | 865 gr (1.91 lbs) |
Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | NP-140 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $572 | $500 |