Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm S8400W
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
90 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm S8400W Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR1000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Released September 2012
Fujifilm S8400W
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1056mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Introduced March 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm S8400W Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm S8400W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the Fujifilm S8400W (16MP) is relatively similar and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR1000 was launched 5 months before the Fujifilm S8400W so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR1000 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S8400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-ZR1000 grades versus the Fujifilm S8400W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm S8400W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm FinePix S8400W. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Fujifilm S8400W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Fujifilm S8400W
| EX-ZR1000 | Fujifilm S8400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8400W over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| Fujifilm S8400W | EX-ZR1000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm S8400W
| EX-ZR1000 | Fujifilm S8400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2012 |  | March 2013 | Similar generation |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm S8400W Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR1000 has external dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Fujifilm S8400W has measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm S8400W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR1000 and the Fujifilm S8400W.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm S8400W is 90 and 61 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm S8400W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing simply by going over technical specs. The graphic below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm S8400W.
As you can tell, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical MP so you should expect similar quality of photos though you may want to take the release date of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm S8400W Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR1000
Portrait photography with Fujifilm S8400W
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
provides face detect focus
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Street photography camera
Fujifilm S8400W as a Street photography camera
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (255 grams)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
heavier than competition in class (670g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Sports photography camera
Fujifilm S8400W as a Sports photography camera
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
better than average battery (470 CIPA)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
incredible zoom range (24-1056mm 44.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Travel photography info
Fujifilm S8400W Travel photography info
better than average battery (470 CIPA)
lighter than average in class (255 grams)
good MP (16MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
missing Time Lapse function
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1056mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (670 grams)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR1000
Landscape photography with Fujifilm S8400W
has manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
better than average battery (470 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
focusing manually
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Vlogging details
Fujifilm S8400W Vlogging details
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average in class (255g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
missing mic socket
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
missing mic socket
heavier than competition in class (670 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm S8400W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Fujifilm FinePix S8400W |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-09-25 | 2013-03-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-1056mm (44.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 97% |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1700s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 7.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255g (0.56 lb) | 670g (1.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | 300 shots |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery model | NP-130 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $572 | $300 |
