Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm SL240
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm SL240 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR1000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Announced September 2012
Fujifilm SL240
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Announced January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm SL240 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm SL240, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the Fujifilm SL240 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR1000 was unveiled 9 months after the Fujifilm SL240 and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR1000 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm SL240 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-ZR1000 grades vs the Fujifilm SL240 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm SL240 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm FinePix SL240. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Fujifilm SL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Fujifilm SL240
| EX-ZR1000 | Fujifilm SL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2012 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 9 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL240 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| Fujifilm SL240 | EX-ZR1000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm SL240
| EX-ZR1000 | Fujifilm SL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm SL240 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR1000 has got external dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Fujifilm SL240 has proportions of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm SL240 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR1000 vs the Fujifilm SL240.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm SL240 is 90 and 67 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm SL240 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes merely by seeing a spec sheet. The picture underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm SL240.
Clearly, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR1000 to show more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR1000 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm SL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Portrait photography factors
Fujifilm SL240 Portrait photography factors
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
comes with face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Street photography factors
Fujifilm SL240 Street photography factors
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (255 grams)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than competition (510g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Sports photography camera
Fujifilm SL240 as a Sports photography camera
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
great battery pack (470 per charge)
low frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
long zoom range (24-576mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Travel photography camera
Fujifilm SL240 as a Travel photography camera
great battery pack (470 CIPA)
lighter than competition in class (255g)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
long reach (576mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (510 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR1000
Landscape photography with Fujifilm SL240
you can focus manually
fairly wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
great battery pack (470 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Timelapse recording
reasonably wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Vlogging information
Fujifilm SL240 Vlogging information
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (255 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of external microphone port
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic port
heavier than competition (510g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm SL240 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Fujifilm FinePix SL240 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-09-25 | 2012-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-576mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 97% |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm�7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m�3.6 m) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 255 gr (0.56 lb) | 510 gr (1.12 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | NP-85 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $572 | $280 |